The Existence of God

AGNOSTICISM (PART 2 OF 4): DISCUSSION ON HUXLEY’S STATEMENT

“According to Huxley, the word was designed as antithetic to the ‘Gnostic’ of early church history, and was intended to be opposed not simply to theism and Christianity, but also to atheism and pantheism.  He meant the word to cover with a mantle of respectability not so much ignorance about God but the strong conviction […]

AGNOSTICISM (PART 2 OF 4): DISCUSSION ON HUXLEY’S STATEMENT Read More »

AGNOSTICISM (PART 1 OF 4): THE CONCEPT OF AGNOSTICISM

“We cannot swing up a rope that is attached to our own belt.” –William Ernest Hocking The issue of Agnosticism is of integral importance to any theological discussion, because agnosticism complacently coexists with the broad spectrum of religions, rather than assuming a separate or opposing theological position.  Thomas Henry Huxley, the originator of the term

AGNOSTICISM (PART 1 OF 4): THE CONCEPT OF AGNOSTICISM Read More »

CONTEMPORARY PHYSICISTS AND GOD’S EXISTENCE (PART 2 OF 3): A SERIES OF CAUSES

If matter, time and space all had a beginning, the question that naturally comes to mind is: How did they come to be?  The Quran tells us that if a person does not believe in God, then he cannot explain the coming into being of anything except by one of three untenable explanations: a.     either

CONTEMPORARY PHYSICISTS AND GOD’S EXISTENCE (PART 2 OF 3): A SERIES OF CAUSES Read More »

CONTEMPORARY PHYSICISTS AND GOD’S EXISTENCE (PART 1 OF 3): THE ETERNALNESS OF MATTER

Whether God exists or not is not as such, part of the subject matter of any empirical science, natural or social.  But the facts or what are sometimes assumed to be the facts of the natural sciences, especially physics and biology, are often interpreted to support one view or the other.  This is not therefore

CONTEMPORARY PHYSICISTS AND GOD’S EXISTENCE (PART 1 OF 3): THE ETERNALNESS OF MATTER Read More »

ATHEISM (PART 2 OF 2): A QUESTION OF UNDERSTANDING

Most Atheist arguments challenge the compatibility of an all-loving God with the perceived injustices of life.  The religious identify such challenges as reflecting an arrogance of intellect — being the assumption that we as mankind, an element of creation ourselves, know better than God how His creation should be ordered — coupled with the failure

ATHEISM (PART 2 OF 2): A QUESTION OF UNDERSTANDING Read More »

WHO IS THE CREATOR?

Can It Be Matter? A very popular question among atheists is, ‘Granted that the existence of temporal things necessitates the existence of an eternal cause, why should that cause be the God of religion?  Why can’t matter be eternal and be therefore in no need of an eternal creator?’  I shall argue, on an Islamic

WHO IS THE CREATOR? Read More »

× How can I help you?