The Existence of God

LIFE WITHOUT GOD: THE IMPLICATIONS OF ATHEISM (PART 2 OF 5)

No ultimate value What is the difference between a human and a chocolate bunny? This is a serious question.  According to many atheists who adopt a naturalistic worldview, everything that exists is essentially a rearrangement of matter, or at least based on blind, non-conscious physical processes and causes. If this is true, then does it

LIFE WITHOUT GOD: THE IMPLICATIONS OF ATHEISM (PART 2 OF 5) Read More »

KNOW GOD, KNOW GOOD: GOD & OBJECTIVE MORALITY (PART 3 OF3)

What if they reject objective morality? As a last resort some atheists try to avoid intellectual embarrassment by replying to the above conclusion by denying that morality is objective.  Fair enough.  I agree.  If someone does not accept the axiom that morals are objective, then the argument does not work.  But that is a double-edged

KNOW GOD, KNOW GOOD: GOD & OBJECTIVE MORALITY (PART 3 OF3) Read More »

KNOW GOD, KNOW GOOD: GOD & OBJECTIVE MORALITY (PART 2 OF3)

Euthyphro’s dilemma Many atheists respond to the above argument from morality by citing Plato’s dilemma or Euthyphro’s dilemma. It goes like this: Is something morally good because God commands it, or does God command it because it is morally good? This dilemma poses a problem for theists who believe in an All-Powerful God because it requires

KNOW GOD, KNOW GOOD: GOD & OBJECTIVE MORALITY (PART 2 OF3) Read More »

NO GOD, NO VALUE

We all strongly feel and believe that human life has ultimate value.  However, can we intellectually justify this non-negotiable feeling and belief we have? Islamic theism has the intellectual tools to justify the truth of our ultimate value.  Conversely, atheism seems to face tremendous philosophical problems.  In short, under atheism, we cannot rationally justify the

NO GOD, NO VALUE Read More »

× How can I help you?